综合信息:
CPU型号: | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz |
CPU核数: | 12 |
CPU主频: | 1895.532 MHz |
内存: | 16046 MB |
SWAP: | 8191 MB |
IP地域信息: | 美国 加利福尼亚州 洛杉矶 cloudradium.com |
虚拟技术: | kvm |
测试时间 : | 2019-10-20 14:37:48 |
IO测试结果:
第一次测试: | 363 MB/s |
第二次测试: | 324 MB/s |
第三次测试: | 347 MB/s |
平均结果: | 344.667 MB/s |
带宽测试:
下载带宽: | 494.43 Mbit/s |
上传带宽: | 4.86 Mbit/s |
SpeedTest国内节点测试
根据经验.SpeedTest的国内节点,具体数值大多不准,仅供参考.具体速度还是自己wget测试准.但可以用来横向对比,来判断哪个线路更好.不用太在意具体数值.
节点 | 上传 | 下载 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
杭州 电信 | 4.73 Mbit/s | 33.22 Mbit/s | 156.546 ms |
西安 联通 | 4.34 Mbit/s | 166.28 Mbit/s | 625.134 ms |
成都 移动 | 4.49 Mbit/s | 40.50 Mbit/s | 196.376 ms |
广东 移动 | 4.61 Mbit/s | 79.67 Mbit/s | 164.524 ms |
inbound下载测试:
下载文件服务器 | 下载文件服务器 | 下载速度 |
---|---|---|
Node Name | IPv4 address | Download Speed |
CacheFly | 205.234.175.175 | 54.3MB/s |
Linode, Tokyo, JP | 139.162.65.37 | 18.0MB/s |
Linode, Singapore, SG | 139.162.23.4 | 10.5MB/s |
Linode, London, UK | 176.58.107.39 | 14.5MB/s |
Linode, Frankfurt, DE | 139.162.130.8 | 14.3MB/s |
Linode, Fremont, CA | 50.116.14.9 | 30.4MB/s |
Softlayer, Dallas, TX | 173.192.68.18 | 39.8MB/s |
Softlayer, Seattle, WA | 67.228.112.250 | 58.5MB/s |
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE | 159.122.69.4 | 14.6MB/s |
Softlayer, Singapore, SG | 119.81.28.170 | 11.2MB/s |
Softlayer, HongKong, CN | 119.81.130.170 | 14.4MB/s |
全国ping值总览:
线路 | 节点数量 | 最快节点 | 最慢节点 | 平均响应 |
---|---|---|---|---|
华南地区 | 19 | 广东广州(天翼云二区)153.9ms | 广东深圳(游戏宽带)193.0ms | 167.7ms |
电信线路 | 56 | 江苏镇江(云朵艾欧)137.0ms | 新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云)244.5ms | 174.2ms |
华东地区 | 44 | 江苏镇江(云朵艾欧)137.0ms | 江苏宿迁(UOVZ)230.8ms | 168.8ms |
华北地区 | 14 | 天津(腾讯云)162.0ms | 河北保定(天翼云)198.1ms | 182.9ms |
联通线路 | 9 | 安徽滁州(联通)151.7ms | 黑龙江哈尔滨(联通)211.1ms | 180.7ms |
华中地区 | 7 | 河南郑州(天翼云)160.5ms | 河南郑州(bgp)199.2ms | 181.4ms |
全部 | 109 | 江苏镇江(云朵艾欧)137.0ms | 新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云)244.5ms | 177.4ms |
西北地区 | 6 | 陕西西安(天翼云二区)176.9ms | 新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云)244.5ms | 197.1ms |
东北地区 | 7 | 辽宁鞍山(电信)185.1ms | 黑龙江哈尔滨(联通)211.1ms | 196.5ms |
移动线路 | 10 | 安徽合肥(vikihost)169.8ms | 江苏宿迁(UOVZ)230.8ms | 192.2ms |
西南地区 | 12 | 重庆(天翼云)180.8ms | 重庆(腾讯云)218.9ms | 195.0ms |
Traceroute路由测试:
上海电信(天翼云) 路由:
跳数 | IP | 地区 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | * | N/A | * |
2 | 10.100.111.254 | 局域网 | 9.3 / 34.6 / 83.6 |
3 | 101.227.255.41 | 上海 电信 | 9.8 / 8.1 / 1491.7 |
4 | 124.74.232.61 | 上海 电信 | 49.7 |
5 | 101.95.206.1 | 上海 电信 | 2.9 / 3.1 / 7.9 |
6 | 101.95.120.166 | 上海 电信 | 7.1 / 4.7 / 10.4 |
7 | 202.97.50.158 | 上海 电信 | 16.9 / 18.8 / 20.7 |
8 | 202.97.90.33 | 上海 电信 | 7.9 / 20.2 / 14.4 |
9 | * | N/A | * |
10 | 23.225.225.229 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 cloudradium.com | 158.9 / 168.9 / 167.5 |
11 | 192.168.206.17 | 局域网 | 170 |
12 | * | N/A | * |
13 | this server IP | 160.2 / 201.5 / 160.1 |
杭州联通 路由:
跳数 | IP | 地区 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | * | N/A | * |
2 | 172.31.9.29 | 局域网 | 10.6 / 0.8 / 32.8 |
3 | 172.31.111.229 | 局域网 | 2.6 / 1.7 / 1.6 |
4 | 124.160.82.177 | 浙江杭州 联通 | 2.6 / 2.7 / 7.5 |
5 | 124.160.81.21 | 浙江杭州 联通 | 3.3 |
6 | 219.158.5.241 | 上海 联通 | 8.9 / 14.6 / 8.9 |
7 | 219.158.109.174 | 上海 联通 | 10.8 / 8.3 / 6 |
8 | 202.97.17.193 | 上海 电信 | 10.6 / 12.3 / 10.1 |
9 | 202.97.46.17 | 上海 电信 | 17.1 / 14.6 / 12.3 |
10 | 202.97.94.237 | 上海 电信 | 24.9 / 27 / 24.4 |
11 | 202.97.33.126 | 上海 电信 | 8.3 / 8.4 / 7.6 |
12 | 202.97.59.170 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 电信 | 162.3 / 160.2 / 157.6 |
13 | 23.225.225.225 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 cloudradium.com | 150.4 / 148.9 / 156.4 |
14 | * | N/A | * |
15 | * | N/A | * |
16 | this server IP | 170.7 / 170.4 / 170.9 |
四川德阳移动 路由:
跳数 | IP | 地区 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 117.174.59.1 | 四川德阳 移动 | 2.4 / 1.1 / 1.6 |
2 | 112.18.212.2 | 四川德阳 移动 | 1.2 / 1.1 / 1.2 |
3 | 112.18.212.1 | 四川德阳 移动 | 2.3 / 1.1 / 1.1 |
4 | 223.87.25.13 | 四川成都 移动 | 2.6 |
5 | 223.87.26.45 | 四川成都 移动 | 5.3 / 5.3 / 3.8 |
6 | 221.183.19.41 | 四川成都 移动 | 3.4 / 3.3 / 3.4 |
7 | 221.176.18.13 | 广东广州 移动 | 41.3 / 41.4 / 41.4 |
8 | 221.176.18.110 | 广东广州 移动 | 41.3 / 43.7 / 44.3 |
9 | 221.183.25.121 | 广东广州 移动 | 42.1 |
10 | 221.183.55.53 | 广东广州 移动 | 57.2 / 56.1 / 57.4 |
11 | 223.120.22.14 | 广东广州 移动 | 47.5 / 56.8 / 47.9 |
12 | 223.120.12.9 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 移动 | 219.8 / 360.6 / 214.7 |
13 | 223.120.6.18 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 移动 | 199.9 / 200.3 / 199.9 |
14 | * | N/A | * |
15 | 23.225.225.221 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 cloudradium.com | 201.4 / 200 / 199.9 |
16 | 192.168.206.17 | 局域网 | 198.8 / 196.9 / 196.9 |
17 | * | N/A | * |
18 | this server IP | 190.1 / 190 / 190.1 |
回程路由测试:
广州电信(天翼云) 回程:
Start: Sun Oct 20 13:39:11 2019 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- gateway 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 2.|-- 23.224.6-81.ceranetworks. 0.0% 10 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.0 3.|-- 23.225.225.241 0.0% 10 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.0 4.|-- 23.225.225.245 0.0% 10 0.9 1.1 0.8 1.3 0.0 5.|-- 59.43.189.41 0.0% 10 153.2 153.2 153.1 153.3 0.0 6.|-- 59.43.187.93 50.0% 10 153.6 153.6 153.6 153.7 0.0 7.|-- 59.43.130.125 0.0% 10 154.2 157.3 154.1 185.8 10.0 8.|-- 202.97.82.38 0.0% 10 168.0 166.8 162.6 170.2 2.7 9.|-- 183.59.12.229 0.0% 10 160.8 160.9 160.8 161.0 0.0 10.|-- 183.56.128.2 0.0% 10 163.3 163.6 163.3 165.0 0.3 11.|-- 14.215.116.1 0.0% 10 155.7 155.8 155.6 156.1 0.0
上海电信(天翼云) 回程:
Start: Sun Oct 20 13:39:27 2019 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- gateway 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 2.|-- 23.224.6-81.ceranetworks. 0.0% 10 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.6 0.0 3.|-- 23.225.225.241 0.0% 10 1.0 1.2 0.9 2.0 0.0 4.|-- 23.225.225.245 0.0% 10 1.0 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.0 5.|-- 59.43.248.106 0.0% 10 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.7 0.0 6.|-- 59.43.182.146 0.0% 10 169.7 169.6 169.5 169.7 0.0 7.|-- 59.43.187.57 40.0% 10 170.6 170.5 170.4 170.7 0.0 8.|-- 59.43.130.209 0.0% 10 168.3 168.9 165.7 171.9 2.2 9.|-- 101.95.88.34 0.0% 10 149.9 151.4 148.5 158.4 3.3 10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
厦门电信CN2 回程:
Start: Sun Oct 20 13:39:44 2019 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- gateway 0.0% 10 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 2.|-- 23.224.6-81.ceranetworks. 0.0% 10 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 3.|-- 23.225.225.241 0.0% 10 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.4 0.0 4.|-- 23.225.225.245 0.0% 10 1.0 1.2 0.9 1.5 0.0 5.|-- 59.43.189.41 0.0% 10 153.3 153.8 153.2 158.5 1.6 6.|-- 59.43.187.101 20.0% 10 154.7 155.1 154.7 156.5 0.4 7.|-- 59.43.130.121 0.0% 10 154.2 154.2 154.1 154.3 0.0 8.|-- 59.43.98.206 0.0% 10 172.5 172.5 172.3 172.7 0.0 9.|-- 27.159.81.254 0.0% 10 161.5 162.7 161.5 170.5 2.7 10.|-- 27.159.81.210 0.0% 10 176.5 190.2 169.9 212.7 17.5 11.|-- 117.25.141.110 0.0% 10 164.9 166.2 164.4 177.2 3.8 12.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.|-- 117.28.254.129 10.0% 10 174.3 175.1 174.3 176.5 0.4
重庆联通 回程:
Start: Sun Oct 20 13:40:01 2019 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- gateway 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 2.|-- 23.224.6-81.ceranetworks. 0.0% 10 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.0 3.|-- 23.225.225.241 0.0% 10 1.0 1.4 1.0 2.7 0.0 4.|-- 23.225.225.245 0.0% 10 1.3 1.1 0.8 1.3 0.0 5.|-- 59.43.182.78 0.0% 10 153.2 154.9 153.0 170.8 5.6 6.|-- 59.43.187.141 50.0% 10 154.9 154.8 154.7 154.9 0.0 7.|-- 59.43.130.157 0.0% 10 155.2 163.7 155.2 199.3 17.9 8.|-- 59.43.17.173 0.0% 10 200.4 201.5 199.9 203.6 1.3 9.|-- 219.158.40.165 0.0% 10 194.0 196.2 193.6 217.0 7.3 10.|-- 219.158.5.129 0.0% 10 201.3 199.5 196.1 202.1 2.2 11.|-- 219.158.12.70 0.0% 10 204.6 203.2 200.5 205.9 2.1 12.|-- 58.144.255.114 0.0% 10 207.2 208.8 207.0 223.7 5.2 13.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
上海移动 回程:
Start: Sun Oct 20 13:40:18 2019 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- gateway 0.0% 10 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 2.|-- 23.224.6-81.ceranetworks. 0.0% 10 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.0 3.|-- 23.225.225.241 0.0% 10 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.0 4.|-- 23.225.225.245 0.0% 10 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.4 0.0 5.|-- 59.43.189.33 0.0% 10 184.6 189.9 184.5 201.2 6.6 6.|-- 59.43.187.61 70.0% 10 180.6 185.3 180.5 194.8 8.2 7.|-- 59.43.130.209 0.0% 10 182.0 184.5 181.0 188.1 2.6 8.|-- 59.43.80.94 0.0% 10 159.6 159.0 157.4 160.8 1.1 9.|-- 202.97.46.2 0.0% 10 170.0 168.3 166.8 170.3 1.0 10.|-- 221.176.23.57 0.0% 10 187.5 193.4 187.5 219.2 12.4 11.|-- 221.176.17.161 10.0% 10 191.1 189.5 186.9 191.1 1.6 12.|-- 221.183.12.170 20.0% 10 190.4 186.4 184.5 190.4 2.5 13.|-- . 0.0% 10 191.4 190.6 185.4 191.8 1.8 14.|-- . 0.0% 10 185.4 187.1 185.4 192.2 2.6 15.|-- . 0.0% 10 191.7 197.2 191.0 207.9 5.3 16.|-- . 0.0% 10 190.0 189.7 189.3 190.1 0.0
海外服务器Ping测试:
Linode日本 :
PING speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=149 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=149 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=149 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=149 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=149 ms --- speedtest.shg1.linode.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 149.539/149.586/149.688/0.251 ms
Vultr日本 :
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=155 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=155 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=154 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=155 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=155 ms --- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 154.968/155.163/155.413/0.455 ms
Budgetvm洛杉矶 :
PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=1.25 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=1.33 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=1.23 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=1.21 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=1.28 ms --- 192.157.214.6 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.214/1.266/1.335/0.052 ms
kdatacenter韩国SK :
PING speedtest.kdatacenter.com (175.126.118.139) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=147 ms 64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=147 ms 64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=147 ms 64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=147 ms 64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=147 ms --- speedtest.kdatacenter.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 147.377/147.478/147.572/0.490 ms
星光韩国KT :
PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=139 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=139 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=139 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=139 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=139 ms --- 210.92.18.1 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 139.387/139.486/139.691/0.484 ms
UnixBench跑分测试:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: Centos74-0dBudQTh: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Tue Aug 22 21:09:27 UTC 2017 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1528 @ 1.90GHz (3791.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 13:41:23 up 1:38, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.13, 0.29; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Oct 20 2019 13:41:23 - 14:09:32 12 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28440776.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4456.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1039.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 970169.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 261405.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2158497.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1522508.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 91232.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10308.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3185.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1501.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2362507.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28440776.7 2437.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4456.7 810.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 1039.6 241.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 970169.5 2449.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 261405.5 1579.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2158497.3 3721.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1522508.4 1223.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 91232.5 228.1 Process Creation 126.0 10308.5 818.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3185.5 751.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1501.9 2503.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2362507.7 1575.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1136.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Oct 20 2019 14:09:32 - 14:37:49 12 CPUs in system; running 12 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 178582579.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 39310.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 27178.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 978736.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 263604.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2884543.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 9608425.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1970013.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 78470.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 33323.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4880.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 5724211.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 178582579.7 15302.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 39310.9 7147.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 27178.2 6320.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 978736.4 2471.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 263604.8 1592.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2884543.0 4973.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 9608425.8 7723.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1970013.4 4925.0 Process Creation 126.0 78470.2 6227.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 33323.1 7859.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4880.1 8133.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 5724211.0 3816.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 5509.5
全国ping值:
ping的地点 | TTL | 丢包率 | 响应时间 (毫秒) |
---|---|---|---|
福建厦门(天翼云一区) | 50 | 0 | 155.780 |
广东广州(腾讯云) | 49 | 0 | 158.307 |
广东深圳(天翼云) | 45 | 0 | 160.432 |
北京(天翼云) | 51 | 0 | 180.216 |
北京(华为云) | 43 | 0 | 184.563 |
福建厦门(天翼云二区/BGP) | 48 | 0 | 175.807 |
安徽合肥(hccn2) | 45 | 0 | 179.105 |
贵州贵阳(天翼云) | 51 | 0 | 190.039 |
广东深圳(游戏宽带) | 52 | 0 | 193.008 |
贵州贵阳(华为云) | 41 | 0 | 200.314 |
四川成都(天翼云) | 50 | 0 | 199.553 |
湖北武汉(天翼云) | 51 | 0 | 174.769 |
江苏镇江(云朵艾欧) | 49 | 25 | 136.959 |
重庆(腾讯云) | 45 | 0 | 218.922 |
湖南长沙(天翼云) | 50 | 0 | 169.385 |
北京(阿里云) | 47 | 0 | 166.759 |
广东广州(天翼云四区) | 45 | 0 | 174.588 |
上海(阿里云) | 48 | 0 | 161.253 |
山西太原(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 174.380 |
江苏苏州(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 172.536 |
湖北襄阳(电信) | 48 | 0 | 187.005 |
云南昆明(天翼云) | 45 | 0 | 189.417 |
上海(bgp) | 48 | 0 | 137.944 |
浙江杭州(电信) | 49 | 0 | 163.982 |
辽宁鞍山(电信) | 49 | 0 | 185.130 |
江苏徐州(bgp) | 48 | 0 | 179.117 |
河南洛阳(bgp) | 46 | 0 | 183.534 |
辽宁大连(蓝视云) | 49 | 0 | 192.793 |
四川成都(腾讯云) | 46 | 0 | 202.140 |
福建泉州(移动) | 47 | 0 | 183.798 |
广东茂名(联通) | 49 | 0 | 165.225 |
安徽芜湖(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 140.944 |
辽宁大连(电信) | 47 | 0 | 198.054 |
江苏南京(天翼云) | 50 | 0 | 163.658 |
辽宁沈阳(天翼云) | 49 | 0 | 204.842 |
江苏镇江(亿速云) | 48 | 0 | 140.094 |
甘肃兰州(天翼云) | 42 | 0 | 183.314 |
江苏镇江(电信) | 50 | 0 | 164.911 |
重庆(电信) | 51 | 0 | 183.145 |
河南郑州(景安网络) | 48 | 0 | 195.665 |
上海(青云) | 50 | 0 | 160.141 |
新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云) | 42 | 0 | 244.519 |
北京(青云3b) | 48 | 0 | 182.542 |
江西南昌(电信) | 51 | 0 | 153.077 |
广东茂名(电信) | 52 | 0 | 157.473 |
山东青岛(阿里云) | 49 | 0 | 172.838 |
广西南宁(天翼云) | 45 | 0 | 168.782 |
江西南昌(炎黄盛世) | 51 | 0 | 165.787 |
黑龙江哈尔滨(联通) | 50 | 0 | 211.057 |
四川绵阳(明源网络) | 52 | 0 | 188.290 |
河南郑州(bgp) | 49 | 0 | 199.152 |
青海西宁(天翼云B) | 45 | 0 | 196.060 |
吉林长春(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 190.783 |
河北保定(天翼云) | 46 | 0 | 198.112 |
重庆(天翼云) | 44 | 0 | 180.785 |
上海(腾讯云) | 47 | 0 | 155.119 |
河北石家庄(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 172.395 |
安徽合肥(移动) | 45 | 0 | 193.723 |
四川绵阳(电信) | 51 | 0 | 194.169 |
江苏镇江(移动) | 46 | 0 | 199.163 |
安徽合肥(vikihost) | 46 | 0 | 169.812 |
江苏徐州(移动) | 46 | 0 | 205.480 |
江苏南通(电信) | 52 | 0 | 157.363 |
广东广州(华为云) | 43 | 0 | 159.795 |
安徽芜湖(电信) | 50 | 0 | 164.579 |
吉林长春(铁通) | 44 | 0 | 193.407 |
内蒙古呼和浩特(天翼云) | 49 | 0 | 184.998 |
上海(华为云) | 42 | 0 | 176.105 |
江苏常州(电信) | 47 | 0 | 145.985 |
福建福州(天翼云) | 50 | 0 | 178.473 |
广东深圳(阿里云) | 49 | 0 | 162.052 |
天津(腾讯云) | 47 | 0 | 162.008 |
宁夏中卫(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 191.538 |
广东广州(移动) | 47 | 0 | 188.316 |
浙江杭州(联通) | 48 | 0 | 170.585 |
广西南宁(联通) | 48 | 0 | 169.549 |
四川德阳(移动) | 47 | 0 | 190.049 |
山东枣庄(联通) | 47 | 0 | 199.994 |
陕西西安(天翼云二区) | 42 | 0 | 176.920 |
广东中山(电信) | 48 | 0 | 161.494 |
浙江杭州(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 145.261 |
广东广州(天翼云二区) | 52 | 0 | 153.917 |
江苏徐州(电信) | 46 | 0 | 160.579 |
安徽滁州(联通) | 51 | 0 | 151.736 |
江苏南京(蓝视云) | 50 | 0 | 159.256 |
北京(青云三区A) | 46 | 0 | 183.863 |
广西南宁(电信) | 51 | 0 | 179.712 |
广东广州(bgp) | 50 | 0 | 156.914 |
浙江杭州(阿里云) | 49 | 0 | 158.509 |
河南郑州(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 160.515 |
江西南昌(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 192.215 |
江苏镇江(联通) | 49 | 0 | 161.250 |
天津(天翼云) | 44 | 0 | 191.532 |
海南海口(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 168.401 |
广东深圳(momayun) | 49 | 0 | 164.180 |
安徽滁州(电信) | 51 | 0 | 152.138 |
上海(天翼云一区) | 52 | 0 | 160.030 |
广东广州(青云) | 50 | 0 | 179.415 |
重庆(联通) | 50 | 0 | 204.113 |
江苏常州(移动) | 45 | 0 | 182.363 |
广东广州(上海云盾) | 43 | 0 | 165.054 |
北京(鹏博士) | 45 | 0 | 192.553 |
北京(bgp) | 49 | 0 | 193.026 |
内蒙古呼和浩特(蓝视云) | 50 | 0 | 194.928 |
山东青岛(天翼云) | 43 | 0 | 146.226 |
江苏宿迁(UOVZ) | 48 | 0 | 230.786 |
江苏徐州(联通) | 48 | 0 | 193.659 |
陕西西安(天翼云一区) | 51 | 0 | 190.736 |
江苏无锡(bgp) | 45 | 0 | 210.147 |